Welcome to Evolution Markets We use cookies for the functionality of our website. We also use some optional functional, performance and marketing cookies, which allow us to make our website and services easy to use and meaningful to you, and to better understand how visitors use our site. This includes working with third party partners, including Google and Byte Studios. We will not set optional cookies without your consent. For more information on all the cookies we use, please see our cookie policy (PDF). Please select your cookies preferences here:

Essential cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.


Statistic cookies help website owners to improve their understanding of how visitors interact with websites by collecting, reporting and analyzing information anonymously.


Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites owned by third parties. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.

  • Newsroom
    • Reports
    • News Releases
    • Market Insights
  • Contact Us
  • evo.ID

  • logo
  • logo
  • Our Business
    • Culture and Values
    • Recognition
    • Executive Team

        We named the company Evolution because markets constantly change. Our brokers are here to help you manage risk and profit from evolving global environmental and energy markets.

    • Our Services
      • Brokerage
      • Structured & Advisory
        • Data Policy
        • EvoMobile™
        Data/Analytics

          Seamless trade execution. Innovative risk management. Bespoke structured transactions.

          Learn more about Evolution Markets’ award winning brokerage services

      • Markets We Serve
          • Carbon Markets
          • Renewable Energy
          • Emission Markets
          Environmental
          • Natural Gas Markets
          • Power Markets
          • Oil Markets
          • Nuclear Fuels Markets
          • Biomass Markets
          • BioFuels Markets
          • Coal Markets
          Energy
        • Finance

            We have the longest continuous presence in carbon markets of any firm. We are a recognized leader in renewable energy markets.

            And now we offer unique hedging and risk management opportunities for the coming energy transition.

        • Our Business
          • Culture and Values
          • Recognition
          • Executive Team
        • Our Services
          • Brokerage
          • Structured & Advisory
          • Data/Analytics
            • Data Policy
            • EvoMobile™
        • Markets We Serve
          • Environmental
            • Carbon Markets
            • Renewable Energy
            • Emission Markets
          • Energy
            • Natural Gas Markets
            • Power Markets
            • Oil Markets
            • Nuclear Fuels Markets
            • Biomass Markets
            • BioFuels Markets
            • Coal Markets
          • Finance
        • Newsroom
          • Reports
          • News Releases
          • Market Insights
        • Contact Us
        • evo.ID

        Cookie/Privacy Notice

        We use cookies for analytics and to improve our site. We have a new Cookie Policy and have also updated our Privacy Policy. You agree to our use of cookies and our privacy policy by closing this message box or continuing to use our site. To find out more visit our privacy policy

        • Home
        • Newsroom
        • Market Insights
        • Forest Day 3: REDD Recommendations and Nicholas Stern on deforestation

        • Previous Post
        • Environment
        • Next Post

        Forest Day 3: REDD Recommendations and Nicholas Stern on deforestation

        12.14.09

        We’re at Forest Day 3 today as the Bella Center and COP15 has taken a day of rest. Before we get into Forest Day, I wanted to provide some further clarity on the draft post-Kyoto UN negotiating texts that are being floated around for discussion.

         

        On Friday, the 2 UN negotiating tracks released draft texts as a starting point for negotiating a post-Kyoto protocol. While the Kyoto Protocol text (originally referred to as the ‘Danish text’) does provide some clarity on the role of markets, the version released by the other UN negotiating track (the LCA) does not provide any details on how markets would work and states that they need to be ‘further elaborated on.’

        We’ll be reviewing each draft in further detail and will update you on the negotiating process this week.

         

        Forest Day: In a morning plenary on using REDD as an effective climate change mitigation option, panelists from business, NGO’s and government all hashed out the following recommendations:

        ·         Inclusiveness: Develop policies that recognize climate benefits from all forest types

        ·         Localization: REDD policies need to be implemented at the provincial level, after all mitigation is action on the ground

        ·         Cost: Cost of implementing REDD is reasonable, but still it is a high cost for small farmers and forest people. Therefore REDD should  come without strings attached in order to move all governments towards sustainable forest management

        ·         Equity: When REDD money arrives, it shouldn’t stay in the hand of the governments.

        REDD can achieve all of the above because as stated by Indonesia’s Secretariat National Council on Climate Change it is a) performance-based b) scalable, and c) addresses the fundamental drivers of deforestation.

         

        What about effects on agriculture if REDD was implemented on a mass scale successfully? While most agree that the ‘battle to feed the world won’t be fought in the forest,’ there was disagreement on how to reallocate agricultural lands in a sustainable way. Clearly, any market mechanism designed to avoid deforestation must also include methodologies and solutions that also take into account the role of agriculture. 

         

        Nicholas Stern spoke at Forest Day to underline why it’s important to take on the challenge of stopping deforestation.  An outline of Stern’s speech is as follows:

        Why? If we want to reduce the risks of climate change, the lowest cost option is stopping deforestation. Estimates from the Stern Review halving deforestation will cost around $15 billion per year-but we won’t know the actual number until policies are closer to implementation. 

        Issue: leakage.  Leakage is an issue that is universal around the world. Addressing leakage simultaneously can help keep costs down.

        Issue: Pricing. At $5-10 per tonne, forestry credits aren't cheap. But prices could be a lot lower if countries around the world act in unison to address leakage.

        How can we implement a plan to address the challenge of combating deforestation?

        1. Sharing costs is crucial. Forestry policy has to be designed by countries where the trees stand, as local governments understand the situation and structures the best.   But governments that are addressing tropical deforestation should share the costs they incur with developed countries. Developed countries have the responsibility for incurring these costs as well as reducing their demand for timber.

        2. Deforestation has to be integrated with development priorities.  

        3. Prices-not at the end of this list because it’s minor, but because of the logical structure in the process. We can’t build prices and markets unless the rest of the deforestation regime makes sense. We have to be thinking about the whole development story in order for the market structure to work out. 

        Since deforestation is a development issue, public money must be allocated in the early days of a deforestation regime. Over time, private money and carbon markets can be included in the regime.

        Ministers of Finance are very cautious about using public money and they are under greater pressure because of the global economic crisis than they have been in a very long time. Therefore, the case for public money has to be made, and made very strongly.  Some of this public money should be debt funding. At Copenhagen, we all need to look very hard for setting aside proper funding to address deforestation.

        How much? At least $15 billion by 2015 will be needed to enforce a regime set up to fight deforestation. 

        To get this money, we need to look across the board at all of the options available: auctioning of permits, debt instruments, taxation of things which aren’t yet taxed such as aviation and maritime, special drawing rights, transaction taxes. One of outcomes needed to be worked out this week in Copenhagen is a serious finance package. 


        Conclusion: Build up markets, make trees more valuable, recognize that investment from public money has to take place and be serious about where it comes from.

         

        Later in the day during a different panel, we learned that there is currently around $4 billion around today specifically allocated for REDD+. Of that money, the donor breakdown is as follows:

        52%-Norwegian Climate and Forest Initiative (government)

        19%-World Bank

        15%-Other multilateral banks (e.g.-GEF)

        13%-Other government

        1%-VCS

        • logo
        • +1 914 323 0200

        • Company
          • Contact
          • Careers
          • News
          • Evo.ID Login
        • Solutions
          • Market Intermediary
          • Structured Transactions
          • Data & Analytics
          • Corporate Environmental Solutions
        • Markets We Serve
          • Environmental
          • Energy
          • Finance
        Trading in futures and options involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
        • Privacy Policy
        • Terms & Conditions
        • Disclaimer
        • Compliance
        • Evolution Markets Futures LLC
        • AB 1305 Disclosures
        • Evolution Markets Inc.